George Washington stands for honesty.

Abraham Lincoln for freedom

Columbus for discovery,

Dr. King’s name stands for Opportunity.

When I think of Dr. King, I think of the Selma marches, I think of Birmingham, I think of Little Rock, Arkansas, where he lead the African-American community in demonstrations asking for the right of equal opportunity in America: a seat on a bus wherever they chose; a restaurant or hotel of their choice; the right to apply for a job without being turned down because you were black. Blatant in-your-face- discrimination was publicized by Dr. King and America was shown it was not right.

It took fearlessness to do that. Who today has that fearlessness that Dr. King and his followers showed all of America?

Today, subtle discrimination denying equal opportunity, denying education, exploiting the poor and guaranteeing less opportunity are the evils that Dr. King, had he lived,  would be attacking today. 

When I write those sentences I just wrote, it seems incomprehensible to me that someone would deny another person that. When you think about it, it is an awful situation to think about. In the 38 years since Dr. King was murdered, the nation has come a long way in breaking down the visible barriers of racism based on creed and the color of one’s skin -- and now, today, the language one speaks and where they are from. The education establishment with the exception perhaps of the Port Chester School District, as pointed out by the Journal News series on education running this week, continues to favor the English-speaking, the wealthied, and the well-situated.

Today the barriers to Equal Opportunity are more subtle and just as effective.

Barriers still exist: in the classroom. There is reluctance to deliver quality education to the black and Hispanic populations in America today. Last year, for the first time, the White Plains City School District has agreed to a pilot program of teaching English speaking and Spanish speaking students together in Kindergarten and the grades going forward. It is about time.

The only reason there is a concentrated effort to do so are the state achievement tests which showed the shame of our education programs for minorities. The Superintendent of Schools Timothy Connors is to be commended for pushing this program.

 On the other hand, there is the perception elsewhere that because your name and skin color are different, you automatically need help and are slow-tracked into remedial classes; the inclusion of the slower (read minority) children in one corner of a classroom so you can deal with the “problem children” all at once; the notion that it is all right to use millions of dollars meant for rebuilding poor performing schools with better buildings, better teachers, but is used to create educational  bureaucracies for the politically connected instead.

In the last ten years the products of this subtle unequal educational opportunity have been well documented and given a name: The Achievement Gap. The educational establishment invests millions in studies to fine solutions to it and they have learned a lot about it. It takes more School District heads to stand up and say like Dr. King, “we simply are not going to educate half the population any more.”  Timothy Connors, to his credit, did that last year.

The lagging of minority youth is blamed on the home and family breakdown. Well then you have to bring more attention to the family unit and those youngsters’ home environment, putting the education in there. It’s expensive but if you want to solve the Achievement Gap you have to do that. The City of White Plains and the School District are reaching out to do that with the Family Excell program reported in WPCNR (the only media to do so last year). How is that doing?

The argument that you have to speak English in the schools and learn through English is  racial superiority. Of course you have to learn to speak English, but really, Bilingual education is how we English-speakers learn another language. Port Chester has achieved this -- and WPCNR pointed this out to the White Plains School Board six years ago. Why is this new?

Why not have teachers educate children in their own language with English simultaneously? It is proven to work in Port Chester and New Rochelle. It is time to stop the subtle prejudice that we do not want non-English speaking children in our towns and schools because they are too hard to educate and will cost us money to do that. They are children, you simply cannot throw them away because they do not speak English.

This discrimination Dr. Martin Luther King would find hard to take.

He would bristle at lowering standards for minorities, because he would see right through that argument, saying:  when are you going to raise the standards for my people because you don’t have to work any harder at educating them if you do not raise your expectations for them.

I think Dr. King would look around today and appreciate how Blacks and Whites, Hispanics and Jews, Catholics and Protestants, Muslims and  other races mingle together in today’s America.

I think he'd observe we are all becoming more appreciative and respectful of each other. But, I do not think he would like today’s buzz word :”diversity” and our smugness about our diversity.

He would say that’s nice, but let’s keep our eye on the prize, to borrow the wonderful motto of the White Plains Department of Public Safety, let us treat all with integrity, professionalism, respect, and to that add opportunity.

Now, let's think how Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. would handle the present homeless situation in White Plains. Where souls were used for political posturing and to appeal to the fears of the citizens and not their sense of fairness and justice.

I believe Dr. Martin Luther King if he were in White Plains today would bring the homeless 40 or so  spending nights in the woods and overflowing at 186 West Post Road at the warming shelter to breakfast with him.  He'd have them camp out in tents at Andy Spano's house or on the island at Renaissance Square. He would not let it pass. He'd run as many warming shelters as he felt necessary and get that television coverage when they were going to be closed down.

Dr. King was not  only politically incorrect, but  politically uncooperative.

He'd introduce the “feared 40” all around to the rich and the powerful and the well-connected and show them the people whom they are treating like cruel political pawns by our leaders on the county and the city level – all over this county.

He'd ask each  to tell their stories at his breakfast next week. He'd prey for compassion from us the wealthy, the powerful and the decent, and the respectable to have compassion for the weak, the misdirected, the addicted and disturbed, and the mortgage-ravaged.

He'd ask White Plains leaders to accept the responsibility of leadership and by reaching out personally to the homeless to provide them meals and, perhaps jobs during the day, to welcome them in to White Plains somehow. To help them make a new start in White Plains in a firehouse, a church, or a vacant hospital. To challenge businesses to weave these persons into the fabric of the downtown, instead of telling them they are not welcome.

He'd challenge us  to step up our humanity,  as Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. did when no one else would 39 years ago.

He'd shame  the two governments, county and city, for not treating the homeless with simple human respect and adhering to the constitution, which prohibits you from being jailed for no reason – a policy incredulously being pushed by politicians who should read the constitution just once to reset their minds.

He'd ask White Plains to rise up and forgive the persons with the prison records who have done their time, and find jobs for them and through forgiveness, and respect for them,  melt away the homeless persons’ suspicions and resentments,  alleged by our "leaders." 

And about our gangs: Dr. Martin Luther King would go out to the streets of Yonkers, Mount Vernon, Port Chester, New Rochelle, Peekskill – the cities where gang activity has been reported – and  speak to them about where they are going. (Perhaps he’d simply speak to White Plains youths, since we have been assured by our officials there are no gangs in White Plains.)

It is difficult to say Dr. King would say to the gang members of our area. But, I assure you he’d be in their midst confronting this problem and admitting it exists.

As we honor Dr. Martin Luther King next Monday. Ask ourselves what Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. would think of the way we have treated the homeless on the Warming Center issue.  What he would think about how we have "reached out?" Would he approve of the way we are working with our youth, our Hispanic population, about how dollars are being used for affordable housing and why it cannot be built faster, about how dollars are being spent in school districts whether on educating people or creating buildings or stadiums; how dollars are being spent by organizations supposedly helping the afflicted, and how they are really doing, and what are they doing with the dollars.

He'd excoriate the variable and below prime mortages now being foreclosed as a new form of financial redlining invented by the financial establishment to exploit. He'd ridicule the efforts of the government to "save" billion dollar financial institutions while allowing homeowners to lose their houses.

Would Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. approve?

He'd remind us that Jesus Christ chose to minister to the "hardcore" of his time. He went into their midst. He  healed them and made them fishers of men.

The way to honor Dr. King tomorrow  and at the "celebrated" holiday  next week is to honor the afflicted, help the troubled with dignity, not humiliate them, not shun them, not “throw them out.”

The way Dr. King would view our world today?

He'd observe that "we need work."

That the lynchings and the shutting of school doors are gone, but the attitudes remain.

And he'd point that out with that his long and finger pointing right at us.

He'd say, "I still have a dream."